Your automation team has a backlog of bots that need rebuilding. Every time the ERP releases a patch or the procurement portal changes a field, a developer has to hunt down the broken selector, update the workflow, and test again. The cost of maintenance can exceed the original implementation. At the same time, high-value, exception-heavy processes still sit on the shelf because no one can build a stable bot for them. This is the maintenance treadmill, and it is eating your automation budget.
Why RPA breaks here
Traditional RPA (UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Power Automate) relies on selectors, xpaths, and object IDs to locate UI elements. When an application updates a class name, changes a layout, or reorders fields, the bot can no longer find its targets. The result is a cascade of failures that require a developer to rebuild the workflow. Industry estimates suggest failure rates due to poor maintenance can reach 30 to 50 percent within the first year of deployment, and maintenance costs can consume more than the original development budget. In many organizations, the backlog of rebuilds is larger than the pipeline of new bots.
What changes with computer use agents
- Survives UI changes. Instead of brittle selectors, agents see the screen and infer what to click and type from visual context.
- No brittle selectors. The agent works across browsers, desktop apps, and legacy systems without requiring stable object IDs.
- Recovers from exceptions. When an action fails or the UI state is unexpected, the agent can analyze the result and retry or adjust its plan.
- Follows the SOP as written. A standard operating procedure in plain English is almost a prompt for a computer use agent, so no flowchart bot is needed.
- Works on legacy and Citrix. Agents operate on real desktops and terminals, including environments where RPA struggles with virtualized or thin-client interfaces.
Computer use agents turn a brittle bot into a durable digital worker that can follow the same SOPs you already have, without needing constant rebuilds.
How to move without the risk
Do not rip out all your RPA at once. Start with one high-pain process where maintenance is eating your budget and where the process has a clear SOP. Work with the Coasty team to run a pilot using the SOP as the source of truth. Measure the difference in maintenance effort, error rates, and time to value. Use those results to build internal confidence, then expand to similar processes. This phased approach lets you keep what works in RPA, high-volume, stable, backend tasks, while applying agents to the long tail of changing UIs, exception-heavy work, and SOP-driven processes.
If your automation team is stuck in a rebuild cycle, it is time to see how computer use agents can turn SOPs into durable workflows. Book a demo with the Coasty team to see how agents that see and act like humans can reduce maintenance and adapt to change: https://cal.com/coasty/15min
Want to see this in action?
View Case Studies