Migration

What to Do When Your RPA Vendor Doubles the Price

David Park||7 min
Ctrl+Z

Last year the VP of operations in one large logistics firm called me. Their UiPath license renewal was coming due at double the previous price. The team had already pushed back three times. The bottleneck wasn’t the volume of work. It was the backlog of bots that broke every time the ERP upgraded its UI. They were paying more to keep the treadmill running, not to go faster.

Why RPA breaks here

UiPath, Automation Anywhere, and Blue Prism all depend on selectors, xpaths, and object IDs. When the application team changes a field name or layout, the bot halts and raises an error. The team then has to rebuild the bot from scratch. Industry studies show that 40 to 60 percent of RPA maintenance time is spent on these rebuilds. In many organizations, the cost of keeping legacy bots running exceeds the initial license fee within two years. When the vendor sees that you are locked into the platform, price increases follow. You are paying for their ability to control your upgrade cycle, not your automation ROI.

What changes with computer use agents

  • Survives UI changes without breaking
  • No brittle selectors or xpaths to maintain
  • Recovers from exceptions instead of halting
  • Follows the SOP as written, no flowchart bot needed
  • Works on legacy desktops, Citrix, and virtualized environments where RPA struggles

The one line a VP of automation should remember: if your bot breaks every time the app updates, you are paying for maintenance, not automation.

How to move without the risk

A phased migration removes the fear of breaking everything at once. Start with a process that is already painful to run manually and has a documented SOP. Pick something where the UI changes frequently and where exceptions are common. Run a pilot with a computer use agent on the same step-by-step procedure the team uses today. Measure the difference in uptime, time spent fixing errors, and the number of manual hours saved. If the agent matches or exceeds the bot’s reliability while surviving UI changes, scale it to more tasks. Keep high-volume, stable backend processes on RPA where it still makes sense. Computer use agents excel on the long tail of exception-heavy and SOP-driven workflows. Over time, you can reduce reliance on brittle bots and shift spend from license and rebuilds to an API that grows with your needs. That is how you protect your budget when the next price increase arrives.

You do not have to stay on a platform that costs more every year for the same reliability. To see how a computer use agent can run your existing SOPs and handle changing UIs, book a demo with the Coasty team at https://cal.com/coasty/15min .

Want to see this in action?

View Case Studies
Try Coasty Free