Why Your Computer Use Agent Costs Are Burning You: Anthropic vs OpenAI vs Coasty (Real Numbers)
Your company is paying for AI computer use agents that can't even open a browser window. OpenAI scored 38% on the only real benchmark for computer use agents. Coasty scored 82%. That 44 percentage point gap isn't a rounding error. It's a $47,000 per employee waste waiting to happen. If you're shopping around based on marketing slides, stop. The numbers don't lie.
The OSWorld Score That Should Make You Angry
OSWorld is the only benchmark that tests computer use agents on real operating systems, real desktop apps, and real file I/O. No gimmicks. No sandboxed environments. Just an agent trying to complete open-ended tasks like a human would. The results are brutal. OpenAI's Operator scored 38%. Anthropic's Claude scored 72%. Coasty scored 82%. That means Coasty is nearly twice as good at using a computer as OpenAI's flagship product. You'd pay the same API rates for both. You'd get completely different results. That's insanity.
What You Actually Pay For (And What You Get)
- ●Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8: $5 per million input tokens, $25 per million output tokens. The pricing card hasn't changed in two years. It's stable, predictable, and overpriced.
- ●OpenAI's Operator: No public per-task pricing yet. You pay for API calls, but nobody tells you how many you'll need per task. Your cost scales with their failures.
- ●Coasty: Transparent pricing with a free tier. You pay for what you use, and you use what you actually complete. Success rates are baked into the cost model.
Mid-sized companies waste 77,000 hours per year on manual administrative work. That's 19 working days per employee. At $65 per hour, that's $3.5 million in pure waste. A decent computer use agent pays for itself in weeks. A bad one costs you millions and delivers nothing.
The Hidden Cost of Bad Computer Use
You think you're saving money by using cheaper models or letting humans do the work. You're not. Manual data entry costs businesses about 19 working days per year per employee. 40% of workers spend at least a quarter of their time on tasks technology could handle. That's not productivity. That's a cost center. When your computer use agent fails 60% of the time, you don't save money. You hire more people to fix the mess. You introduce more errors. You burn cash on something that should be automated.
Why Coasty Is The Obvious Choice
Coasty isn't just a model wrapper. It's a real computer use agent that controls desktops, browsers, and terminals. It runs on desktop apps or cloud VMs. You can deploy agent swarms to run tasks in parallel. The 82% OSWorld score isn't a fluke. It's the result of thousands of hours testing against real-world scenarios. Other vendors talk about computer use. Coasty actually does it. If you're evaluating AI computer use agents in 2026, Coasty is the only one that can back up its claims with real numbers. The free tier proves it works. The API pricing proves it's fair. The OSWorld score proves it's better.
Stop paying for marketing and start paying for results. OpenAI's 38% on OSWorld tells you everything you need to know. Coasty's 82% tells you what you should actually buy. Go to coasty.ai and see what real computer use automation looks like. If you're still paying humans to copy-paste data in 2026, you're the problem. Not the AI.