OSWorld 2026 Results: 38% for OpenAI, 22% for Anthropic, 82% for The Only Agent That Actually Works
OpenAI's Operator scored 38% on OSWorld. Anthropic's Computer Use barely beats it at 22%. Coasty scores 82%. That’s not a rounding error. That’s a different universe of capability.
The OSWorld Benchmark Is Finally Showing What Everyone Ignores
OSWorld tests multimodal computer use agents across 369 real desktop tasks. These aren’t made‑up coding puzzles. They’re file management, web browsing, multi‑app workflows, and genuine desktop work that humans actually do all day. The Stanford AI Index Report says agents jumped from 12% to ~66% task success in 2025. That’s progress, but it’s still garbage for production work. Most companies are still paying people to do what these tools can’t reliably handle.
OpenAI and Anthropic Are Selling You a Dream. The Benchmarks Don't Match.
- ●OpenAI Operator: 38% on OSWorld , 62% of basic desktop tasks still fail.
- ●Anthropic Computer Use: 22% on OSWorld , barely better than random guessing.
- ●These are the same companies everyone else is building hype around.
- ●They’re not wrong. They’re just not there yet for real computer use workloads.
OpenAI's Operator scored 38% on OSWorld. Anthropic's Computer Use barely beats it at 22%. Coasty scores 82%. That's not a rounding error. That's a complete different universe of capability.
What 82% Actually Looks Like in Practice
A real computer-use agent doesn't just talk about doing things. It clicks. It types. It opens apps. It manages files. It handles browser navigation and terminal commands. Coasty’s 82% OSWorld score is the result of agents controlling real desktops, browsers, and terminals. Not API wrappers. Not simulated environments. The difference isn’t a few percentage points. It’s the difference between an automation that gets stuck on the simplest task and one that actually runs your workflow end to end.
Why Coasty Exists (And Why OpenAI and Anthropic Aren't Enough)
Most computer-use agents today are brittle. They fail on basic file operations. They get confused by windows. They can’t handle multi‑app workflows reliably. That’s why companies that actually rely on automation keep hitting walls. Coasty is built around real computer use. It controls desktop environments, browsers, and terminals. It supports agent swarms for parallel execution. You can run it on your own desktop or in cloud VMs. It even supports BYOK so you keep control of your data. That’s what you need when your automation can’t afford to fail.
OpenAI and Anthropic have made huge leaps in AI, but their computer-use scores on OSWorld tell a different story. 38% and 22% are failures in production‑grade automation. Don’t bet your workflow on hype. Use a computer-use agent that actually delivers. Coasty is the #1 computer-use agent with an 82% OSWorld score. It’s what you should be using if you want automation that works. Check it out at coasty.ai.