Comparison

UiPath Is Dead. AI Agents Just Killed It (Not Even Close)

Lisa Chen||7 min
End

Fortune 500 companies spent $91 million on a failed IT modernization project. That's not a typo. Another study found 83% of AI-driven transformations fail. Meanwhile Gartner predicts 40% of agentic AI projects get canceled by 2027. The problem isn't AI. The problem is the tools you're using.

RPA Was Built in 2010. It Can't Survive 2026

UiPath dominates the RPA market at 57% share. It's the default choice for automation teams. But the technology was designed for a world without AI. You drag a box. You point to a button. You hope it works. That works fine when your process is predictable. It fails completely when anything changes. A UI update breaks your bot. A popup appears. A field name changes. Your $50,000 automation goes down. Meanwhile your employees spend 15 hours a week on admin work. That's 780 hours per year per person. At an average salary of $75,000, that's $96,000 wasted per worker every single year.

The 40% Failure Rate Is Actually Good News

  • Gartner says 40% of agentic AI projects get canceled.
  • That means 60% actually work.
  • RPA projects fail silently in the background.
  • Nobody reports when a bot stops working after three months.

AI agents don't need perfect screenshots. They don't need brittle selectors. They actually understand what they're doing. They see the screen, they reason, they act. That's why Coasty scores 82% on OSWorld, the toughest benchmark for computer use AI.

Computer Use Is the Real Thing. RPA Is a Simulation

UiPath bots don't really use your software. They click pixels. They rely on visual selectors that break at the first sign of change. AI computer use agents are different. They see the screen. They reason about what they see. They click, type, scroll, and navigate like a human. Anthropic's Computer Use gets 22% on the same benchmark. OpenAI's Operator scores 38%. Coasty hits 82%. The gap isn't small. It's massive. One agent can handle real work. The others need constant human supervision.

Agentic AI Will Kill More RPA Than Code Will

RPA vendors are frantically adding AI features. They claim to be AI-first now. That's too little too late. The fundamental architecture is wrong. You're still building brittle workflows for brittle inputs. Agentic AI builds workflows dynamically based on what it sees. It adapts. It handles edge cases. It doesn't break when Google changes a button label. McKinsey found agentic AI can handle entire workflows, not just small tasks. That's the real shift. From automation to autonomy.

Why Coasty Exists (And Why It Wins)

Coasty isn't another RPA vendor pretending to be AI. It's a computer use agent built from the ground up for the real world. It controls desktops, browsers, and terminals. It runs on your infrastructure via desktop app or cloud VMs. It executes agent swarms in parallel for faster work. It supports BYOK so your data stays yours. It has a free tier so you can try it without risking your budget. The 82% OSWorld score isn't marketing. It's proof that Coasty can actually do the work. Not pretend. Do it.

Stop building brittle bots on fragile foundations. Start using AI agents that can actually handle real work. Check out coasty.ai. The future isn't RPA. It's computer use agents. And Coasty is already there.

Want to see this in action?

View Case Studies
Try Coasty Free